Total Discordant Cases (AI vs Gold): 2010 Discordance Analysis
11 Discordance Analysis
This section analyzes cases where there was a disagreement between the AI, the Pathologists, and the Reference Diagnosis (Research Diagnosis).
11.1 AI vs Reference Diagnosis
11.1.1 Discordant Cases Table
| Slide_Label | Dx_Paige | Dx_Research | case_difficulty |
|---|
11.2 Pathologist Discordance (No AI)
We analyze cases where pathologists disagreed with the Reference Diagnosis without AI assistance.
| Pathologist | Error_Rate_NoAI |
|---|---|
| P1 | 0.826 |
| P2 | 0.953 |
| P3 | 0.947 |
| P4 | 0.899 |
11.3 Impact of AI on Discordance
Did AI help correct these errors?
| Pathologist | Cases_Improved |
|---|---|
| P1 | 0 |
| P2 | 0 |
| P3 | 0 |
| P4 | 0 |
11.4 Common Features of Discordant Cases
Are “Hard” cases more likely to be discordant?
Any Pathologist Error (No AI)
|
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| FALSE | TRUE | ||
| case_difficulty | |||
| Difficult | 0 (0%) | 89 (100%) | 89 (100%) |
| Easy | 598 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 598 (100%) |
| Moderate | 0 (0%) | 136 (100%) | 136 (100%) |
| Total | 598 (73%) | 225 (27%) | 823 (100%) |